What
do words - sustainable, organic, and natural - stand for in the time of those
words often misuse? That has been my question about organic food industry. Technically,
the popularity of organic food has been rising because consumers have become
more aware of healthy lifestyle and sustainable and moral way of processing
foods. Waste is produced by the nitrogen and pesticide running off the
industrial fields and harmful heat energy exerted from tractors and trucks for
industrial farming. (Pollan 130). To prevent these problems and following more
negative consequences, organic food industry emerged. However, Pollan in The Omnivore’s Dilemma states that
organic products even in the organic supermarket aren’t really organic. He says
that “I would much rather use my money to keep my neighborhood productive and
healthy than export my dollars five hundred miles away to get ‘pure product’
that’s really coated in diesel fuel” (132). This explains why organic foods can
be as unsustainable as typical industrialized foods. It neglects saving energy
waste, bioregionalism, and seasonality that are supposed to be an ideal
standard of organic foods.
I
think that saving energy waste, bioregionalism, and seasonality shouldn’t even
be the ideal standard, but it should be required to be called “organic foods”.
It actually makes me doubt when I see “certified organic” mark on the foods in
grocery store because this word has been used so many times in food industry
for marketing, fabricating an image of all “certified organic” marked foods are
sustainable, green, and fresh which isn’t true in most of the case except in
Farmer’s market or more local-concentrated markets. I realized at some point I
lost the excitement to see “organic” marked foods which I supposed to think
these would make me healthier. It is sad to see how our commercialized and
industrialized society leads organic food to be just one of the popular trends
that consumers can access without rethinking about foods themselves beyond what
a label tells them.
Pollan
states that “Our food system depends on consumers’ not knowing much about it
beyond the price disclosed by the checkout scanner. Cheapness and ignorance are
mutually reinforcing” (245). It shows that ignorance of consumers let organic
foods lose its essence. Industrialized world pushes organic foods to be cheaper
and more convenient that distribution and production of organic foods make unsustainable.
I believe that organic foods should be only from local farmers who would reduce
use of fuel to move around their products. If consumers are more educated about
the real concept of organic foods, then they will appreciate foods in a deeper
level of understanding there do they come from and how they are processed.
Pollan
talks also about slaughter and its cruelty. He argues that how scale makes all
the difference in more sustainable and moral killing of animals for foods. Joel,
a grass farmer, says that in The
Omnivore’s Dilemma “That’s another reason we don’t raise a hundred thousand
chickens. It’s not just the land that couldn’t take it, but the community too”
(230). Basically, I think that people should stop expecting too much from the
land and nature to produce what they want. This relates to booming of
industrial organic foods because people have too much greed for faster, more
convenient, and cheaper foods so that organic foods are forced to process and
deliver in lower quality and in an unsustainable way.
Hi Sue,
ReplyDeleteSome interesting thoughts about organic food here. It's also weird to note how consumer demand for "better" food got warped into it's own industry as well. Knowing what you do now, would you forgo the supermarket all together and instead go to a farmers market? That also seems pretty expensive, and not a whole solution, not that Pollan gives us one. See you in class tomorrow!